The U.S. ITC made some final rulings on certain casual shoes and their packaging
On June 10, 2022, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issued an announcement stating that certain casual footwear and packaging thereof (Certain Casual Footwear and Packaging Thereof), investigation code: 337- TA-1270) made a final ruling in Part 337: The preliminary ruling (No. 58) made by the administrative judge in this case on May 30, 2022 will not be reviewed, that is, the defendants La Modish Boutique, West Covina, CA, and Star of the United States are listed. Bay Group Inc., Hackensack, NJ, Huizhou Xinshunzu Shoes Co., Ltd., Guangdong, China, and Jinjiang Anao Footwear Co., Ltd., Fujian, China, are absent defendants.
On May 27, 2022, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issued a final ruling: the preliminary ruling made by the administrative judge in this case on May 6, 2022 ( No. 56) will not be reviewed, that is, based on the consent order, the investigation against the named defendant Loeffler Randall Inc., New York, NY, will be terminated.
On May 17, 2022, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issued a final ruling: the preliminary ruling made by the administrative judge in this case on April 22, 2022 ( No. 54) is not subject to review, that is, based on the consent order, the investigation against the named defendant Royal Deluxe Accessories, LLC, New Providence, NJ, is terminated and a consent order is issued.
On March 18, 2022, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issued a final ruling: the preliminary ruling made by the administrative judge in this case on March 3, 2022 ( No. 46) is not subject to review, that is, based on the consent order, the lawsuit against the named defendants Maxhouse Rise Ltd., Hong Kong, China, and Fujian Wanjiaxin Industrial Developing, Inc. a/k/a Fujian Wanjiaxin Light Industrial Developing, Inc., China, is terminated. Fujian Wanjiaxin Light Industry Development Co., Ltd. investigated and issued a consent order.
On February 22, 2022, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issued a final ruling: the preliminary ruling made by the administrative judge in this case on February 1, 2022 ( No. 40) will not be reviewed, that is, the investigation of the listed defendant, Shanghai KGS Sourcing Ltd., China, will be terminated based on reasonable reasons.
On February 4, 2022, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issued an announcement stating that it would investigate Certain Casual Footwear and Packaging Thereof. Code: 337-TA-1270) made a final ruling in Part 337: The preliminary ruling (No. 39) made by the administrative judge in this case on January 11, 2022 will not be reviewed, that is, based on the settlement, the case against the listed defendant, Dongguan, Guangdong, China, will be terminated. Eastar Footwear Enterprises Co., Ltd. investigated and issued a consent order.
On December 6, 2021, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issued a final ruling: the preliminary ruling made by the administrative judge in this case on November 10, 2021 ( No. 34) No review, that is, based on the settlement and consent order, the investigation against the named defendant 718 Closeouts, Brooklyn, NY, was terminated and a consent order was issued.
On November 29, 2021, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issued a final ruling: the preliminary ruling made by the administrative judge in this case on November 1, 2021 ( No. 32, 33) will not be reviewed, that is, based on the consent order, the investigation against the named defendants PW Shoes, Inc. a/k/a P&W and Shoe-Nami, Inc., Gretna, LA will be terminated and the consent will be issued. make.
On November 17, 2021, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issued a final ruling: the preliminary ruling made by the administrative judge in this case on September 13, 2021 ( No.30) will not be reviewed, that is, the complaint will be revised based on the information discovered, adding eight named defendants: Huizhou Xinshunzu Shoes Co., Ltd., Guangdong, China, Huizhou Xinshunzu Shoes Co., Ltd., Orley Shoe Corp of the United States, and Dongguan, Guangdong, China Eastar Footwear Enterprises Co., Ltd. Dongguan Yida Shoes Co., Ltd., China Shanghai KGS Sourcing Ltd. Kaijie Management Consulting (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Brazil Mould Industria de Matrizes Ltda. d/b/a Boaonda, China Fujian Fujian Wanjiaxin Industrial Developing, Inc. a/k/a Fujian Wanjiaxin Light Industrial Developing, Inc. Fujian Wanjiaxin Light Industrial Developing, Inc., U.S. Walmart Inc., China Fujian Jinjiang Anao Footwear Co., Ltd Jinjiang Anao Footwear Co., Ltd. ; Due to insufficient reasons, we do not agree to add Burlington Shoes, Inc. in the United States, Mamiye Brothers Inc. in Shanghai, China, Mamiye Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., and Jinjiang LinQi Shoes & Clothes Co., Ltd. in Fujian, China. The company is a named defendant; it has partially terminated the investigation of Crocsky, Austin, TX, USA, Ink Tee, Los Angeles, CA, Hobibear Shoes and Clothing Ltd., Brighton, CO, USA, and disagrees with calling them “unknown manufacturers ( unknown manufacturers); in addition, the preliminary ruling (No. 31) made by the administrative judge in this case on October 22, 2021 will not be reviewed, and the expected completion date will be extended by four months to May 9, 2023, and the hearing date will be adjusted at the same time By September 12-16, 2022, a final ruling on infringement is expected to be issued on January 9, 2023.
On October 7, 2021, U.S. International Trade The Commission (ITC) issued a final ruling: It will not review the preliminary ruling (No. 22-25) made by the administrative judge in this case on September 17, 2021, that is, based on the settlement and consent order, it will terminate the lawsuit against the listed defendant Fullbeauty Brands of the United States respectively. Inc. d/b/a Kingsize, New York, NY, Legend Footwear, Inc., d/b/a/ Wild Diva, City of Industry, CA, Fujian, China Fujian Huayuan Well Import and Export Trade Co., Ltd., China Fujian Huayuan Well Import and Export Trading Co., Ltd., and the United States Yoki Fashion International LLC, New York, NY, investigated and issued a consent order.
On July 6, 2021, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) voted to launch a 337 investigation into Certain Casual Footwear and Packaging Thereof. (Investigation number: 337-TA-1270).
On June 8, 2021, Crocs, Inc. of Broomfield, Colorado filed a Section 337 investigation application with the U.S. ITC, claiming that exports to the United States, imports in the United States, and The product sold in the United States infringes its patent rights (U.S. registered trademark numbers 3,836,415, 5,149,328, 5,273,875) and requests the U.S. ITC to issue a general exclusion order, limited exclusion order, and prohibition order.
China Fujian Quanzhou ZhengDe Network Corp., d/b/a Amoji, China Quanzhou Zhengde Technology Network Co., Ltd., the United States 718Closeouts, Brooklyn, NY, the United States Royal Deluxe Accessories , LLC, New Providence, NJ, China Fujian Huayuan Well Import and Export Trade Co., Ltd., China Fujian Huayuan Well Import and Export Trade Co., Ltd., etc. are the named defendants.
Original text: https://www.usitc.gov/secretary/fed_reg_notices/337/337_1270_notice_06102022sgl.pdf
AAA Functional Fabric Network EGRTHRTH
Disclaimer:
Disclaimer: Some of the texts, pictures, audios, and videos of some articles published on this site are from the Internet and do not represent the views of this site. The copyrights belong to the original authors. If you find that the information reproduced on this website infringes upon your rights, please contact us and we will change or delete it as soon as possible.
AA
